Posting Rules | post new threads post replies post attachments edit your posts is are code is are are are | Similar Threads | Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | | off-the-grid | Plumbing Systems and Fixtures | 14 | 23-07-2010 04:43 | | redcobra | Training, Licensing & Certification | 28 | 26-09-2009 16:11 | | Fishman_Tx | Construction, Maintenance & Refit | 16 | 31-08-2009 11:46 | | dancamp009 | Deck hardware: Rigging, Sails & Hoisting | 4 | 22-10-2008 11:22 | | Boracay | Cooking and Provisioning: Food & Drink | 53 | 28-09-2008 19:25 | Privacy Guaranteed - your email is never shared with anyone, opt out any time. - Electric Cars
- Electric Bikes
- Electric Boats
- EV Conversions
- Electric Flight
- Electric Transport
- Hydrogen Fuel Cell
- Readers’ Questions
Electric Candela hydrofoil boat sets world record by crossing Baltic Sea- September 16, 2024
- 2 minute read
- Joshua S. Hill
An all-electric hydrofoiling boat from Swedish company Candela has set two new world records by travelling between Stockholm and the Finnish autonomous region of Åland, marking the first time an electric boat has crossed the Baltic Sea. Candela, which has developed a range of electric hydrofoil boats and ships, wanted to demonstrate that “that zero-emission sea travel is not only possible today, but that foiling electric ships and boats are so much cheaper to operate than fossil-fuelled vessels.” The record-breaking journey was undertaken in the Candela C-8, a €330,000 ($A544,500) leisure craft, equipped with a battery from technology partner Polestar. The journey covered 150 nautical miles from the port of Frihamn in Stockholm, Sweden, to Mariehamn, the capital and largest town of the Åland Islands, an autonomous region of Finland, with a charging stop in Kapellskär. While charging along the trip was made mostly with existing charging infrastructure, a 40kW Kempower Movable Charger was needed in Kapellskär. Leaving from Frihamn at 6am, the Candela C-8 made it to Mariehamn by lunchtime, and returned to Frihamn the same day. YouTube : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hFoRF_Q0CA “The disadvantage of electric boats has been their short range, due to traditional boat hulls consuming so much energy,” said Gustav Hasselskog , the company’s CEO and founder. “With our hydrofoil technology, we combine high speed and range, but you get so many other benefits. Flying over the Åland Sea in total silence and without slamming was absolutely magical.” A gasoline-powered chase boat of similar size accompanied the Candela C-8 on the journey and had to be refuelled for a cost of €750, or around $A1,230. For comparison, the Candela C-8 consumed 213 kWh of electricity, at a cost of about €40-50 (around $A66-83). “We actually had range anxiety, but not for the Candela,” said Gustav Hasselskog. “The irony is that the photographer’s gasoline-powered chase boat had to refuel six times during the trip, while we only charged three times. “We’re talking about 95% lower operating costs,” concluded Hasselskog. “This is a revolution that makes waterborne transöport competitive with land transport in terms of costs, which we will now demonstrate in public transport in Stockholm.” Joshua S. Hill is a Melbourne-based journalist who has been writing about climate change, clean technology, and electric vehicles for over 15 years. He has been reporting on electric vehicles and clean technologies for Renew Economy and The Driven since 2012. His preferred mode of transport is his feet. We are definitely in an age of disruption, as much as the bashers, critics and cynics like to deny it. Amazing, 1/25th the cost of their ICE partner boat! And quieter, cleaner and calmer too boot! Google informs me a litre of diesel is € 1.668, so that trip would have used ~450 litres of diesel, or 4,500 kWh. That’s shockingly inefficient. Input your search keywords and press Enter. Stay up to date with notifications from The IndependentNotifications can be managed in browser preferences. UK Edition Change- UK Politics
- News Videos
- Paris 2024 Olympics
- Rugby Union
- Sport Videos
- John Rentoul
- Mary Dejevsky
- Andrew Grice
- Sean O’Grady
- Photography
- Theatre & Dance
- Culture Videos
- Fitness & Wellbeing
- Food & Drink
- Health & Families
- Royal Family
- Electric Vehicles
- Car Insurance Deals
- Lifestyle Videos
- Hotel Reviews
- News & Advice
- Simon Calder
- Australia & New Zealand
- South America
- C. America & Caribbean
- Middle East
- Politics Explained
- News Analysis
- Today’s Edition
- Home & Garden
- Broadband deals
- Fashion & Beauty
- Travel & Outdoors
- Sports & Fitness
- Climate 100
- Sustainable Living
- Climate Videos
- Solar Panels
- Behind The Headlines
- On The Ground
- Decomplicated
- You Ask The Questions
- Binge Watch
- Travel Smart
- Watch on your TV
- Crosswords & Puzzles
- Most Commented
- Newsletters
- Ask Me Anything
- Virtual Events
- Wine Offers
- Betting Sites
Thank you for registeringPlease refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in Please refresh your browser to be logged in How has Italy reduced small boat arrivals by more than 60% in a year – and what is the Albania scheme?Sir keir starmer says he is looking to italy for answers on how to reduce channel crossings, article bookmarked. Find your bookmarks in your Independent Premium section, under my profile Sign up for the View from Westminster email for expert analysis straight to your inboxGet our free view from westminster email, thanks for signing up to the view from westminster email. Sir Keir Starmer has claimed that Britain can learn lessons from Italy on how to reduce migration , after far-right prime minister Giorgia Meloni ’s administration saw small boat arrivals fall by more than 60 per cent this year. Ahead of a visit to Rome , Sir Keir hailed Italy’s “dramatic” drop in unregulated migration and expressed interest in Ms Meloni’s proposed asylum processing scheme in Albania, just months after scrapping the Tories’ controversial Rwanda scheme . Claiming that his talks with Ms Meloni had marked a return to “British pragmatism”, Sir Keir also praised Italy’s “upstream work” in north Africa, saying: “I have always made the argument that preventing people leaving their country in the first place is far better than trying to deal with those that have arrived.” Reducing the number of perilous small-boat crossings across the Channel is a political priority for the Labour government, which has announced its intention to “smash” people-smuggling gangs but has stopped short of opening safe alternative routes for asylum seekers to travel to Britain to have their claims heard. The prime minister is now looking to Italy’s example, where the country’s interior ministry reported a 62 per cent fall in migrant arrivals on Italian coasts over the first seven months of 2024. Frontex , the EU’s border force, has calculated a 64 per cent fall in the number of people arriving from north Africa to Italy and Malta. Hardline immigration policiesItaly has long struck a hard line against migration, with deputy prime minister Matteo Salvini having tightened asylum seekers’ access to support and public services. He could now face six years in jail for preventing a boat carrying more than 100 people from docking in Italy in 2019. But the country’s hardline policies and rhetoric had failed to prevent cross-Mediterranean migration to Italy from continuing to rise dramatically until the fall seen this year, which has been widely attributed to controversial deals struck with the north African nations from which most boats depart. While Italy has strengthened ties with Libya and is training and equipping the Libyan coastguard, the EU last year pledged €105m (£88m) to Tunisia to stop migrant crossings from setting off. However, Tunisia later said it had handed back some €60m of EU budget support amid a row over the funding. Human rights observers have since warned that EU funds are being used by countries including Tunisia to carry out “collective expulsions” of migrants, including people intercepted at sea en route to Italy, who are then put on buses and dumped in remote or desert areas. And as part of the crackdown on crossings that has been funded by Europe, the UN’s International Organisation for Migration warned this year that it believed some 15,000 to 20,000 migrants had become stranded in rural areas near the central Tunisian coastline. Human Rights Watch has also accused Italy and the EU of being “complicit” in crimes carried out against migrants intercepted at sea and returned to Libya, where the UN has warned they faced “murder, enforced disappearance, torture, enslavement, sexual violence, rape, and other inhumane acts”. Italy’s supreme court ruled this year that it is unlawful for Italy to return intercepted ships to Libya as it is not a safe country. That ruling followed long-running attempts by Rome to make it more difficult for charities rescuing migrants at sea to operate, including handing them fines for refusing to cooperate with the Libyan authorities. The fall in arrivals in Italy this year has also corresponded with a rise in arrivals via the shorter eastern Mediterranean route to Greece of nearly 57 per cent, according to the EU’s border agency Frontex. These crossings previously fell under an EU deal with Turkey in 2016. Warning that Italy’s apparent fall in numbers must be put into context, Alberto-Horst Neidhardt, a migration specialist at the European Policy Centre think tank, noted that this year’s figures are in comparison with a significant surge seen in 2023, while the fact that overall arrivals to the EU have remained roughly static suggests that the flows of migration have merely shifted elsewhere. Mr Neidhart told The Independent that the reduction in arrivals is due to a combination of factors, including the obstruction of Mediterranean rescue operations and more vigorous efforts by Tunisia to prevent departures and return migrants to their countries of origin. But he warned that the deals such as those with Tunisia and Libya are “short-term patchy remedies that treat the symptoms and not the root causes of irregular migration”, and that they “serve the purpose of saving the face of European governments by keeping their most unacceptable side-effects, including violations of human rights, as far away as possible from European voters’ eyes”. Mr Neidhart added: “There is also ample evidence that pouring money and resources into unstable countries governed by authoritarian regimes only makes the problem worse in the longer term, promoting elites’ economic interests, fuelling corruption, and undermining good governance.” Italy’s Albania dealIn a further bid to cut migration to Italy, Ms Meloni has struck a deal with Albania to create an offshore asylum processing system, which is yet to come to fruition. In an echo of the controversy around the UK’s costly and long-delayed Rwanda scheme, Human Rights Watch has described Italy’s scheme – initially intended to become operational in May – as a “model of mismanagement and a blueprint for abuse” costing hundreds of millions of euros. But with Sir Keir now expressing interest in replicating the Albania deal, home secretary Yvette Cooper insisted on Monday that it is “very, very different” from the axed Rwanda plan. Under the Tory scheme, asylum seekers would have been permanently deported to Rwanda. By contrast, Albania will accept asylum seekers on Italy’s behalf while their claims are processed. Failed asylum seekers from safe countries will then be returned to those countries, while those whose asylum claims are successful – expected to be a small minority – will be brought to Italy. Criticising the Albania scheme, Judith Sunderland of Human Rights Watch said in June: “Italy’s latest gambit to offshore its responsibilities is all but guaranteed to violate people’s rights. “Following its abusive deal with Libya, Italy now wants to take people who have effectively reached the country outside of the EU, breaching fundamental tenets of rescue at sea and undermining asylum rights and freedom from arbitrary detention.” Both Ms Sunderland and Mr Neidhart warned that the scheme was unlikely to deter people from making dangerous boat crossings, with the latter adding: “In fact, most of the persons processed in Albania will be transferred to Italy, after their procedure is over. “The deal should be seen for what it is: a costly operation that moves the processing of claims outside the Italian territory, with questionable administrative benefits, ... intended to demonstrate to the Italian electorate that the government is acting on its pledge to crack down against irregular migration. “It should also be seen as a deliberate and more concerted attempt to create a hostile environment for those arriving irregularly in Europe, at a time of growing social and political divisions and tensions.” Join our commenting forumJoin thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this articleWant to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today. New to The Independent? Or if you would prefer: Hi {{indy.fullName}} - My Independent Premium
- Account details
- Help centre
- Search forums
- Practical Boat Owner's Reader to Reader
Forestay and baby stay tension- Thread starter crown22
- Start date 5 Jul 2018
Hello New to me sailing boat has had the mast re-stepped very quickly by the boatyard.At present the baby stay which goes about four fifths up the mast is bar tight almost but the main forestay is slack with about an inch or two of movement half way up. Should the forestay have less movement in it than the babystay?Thanks Well-known memberThe two stays do different things. suggest you slacken off the babystay, tension the forestay by by adjusting the backstay. The babystay and the aft lower shrouds should then be tensioned so that the mast is straight with no bend in the middle. You will find more detail on setting up your rigging on the Selden website. Do you actually need the babystay? Most boats only have them if an owner has retro fitted them. If you are not going to use it you could remove it and that will make it easier to tack the overlapping headsail. If it is for a storm jib, then the best idea is to fit a Highfield lever and secure the stay near the base of the mast when not in use. If it is a retro-fit item its a good idea to check that whoever fitted it put an adequate backing plate under the deck fitting. sailaboutvicA lot going to depend on your boat and if a head sail furler or hank on jib , if you need any rake or bend . I would start with slacking off all the screw and get your mast up right and in the middle , then if it's isn't a racer I would tighten up each one counting the thread until your happy it's tight enough , then take it out in about 10 knot first on one tack then the other , if you find there any slackness take up a couple of turns , go on the other tack and do the same again . There other ways like measuring your shrouds about 1 meter and it measuring the distance, from the bottle screw or you go to the expense of buying springs or pay a rigger to do it for you , but what ever way you do it you have to start with getting the mast straight and in the centre. Norman_E said: Do you actually need the babystay? Most boats only have them if an owner has retro fitted them. If you are not going to use it you could remove it and that will make it easier to tack the overlapping headsail. If it is for a storm jib, then the best idea is to fit a Highfield lever and secure the stay near the base of the mast when not in use. If it is a retro-fit item its a good idea to check that whoever fitted it put an adequate backing plate under the deck fitting. Click to expand... crown22 said: Hello New to me sailing boat has had the mast re-stepped very quickly by the boatyard.At present the baby stay which goes about four fifths up the mast is bar tight almost but the main forestay is slack with about an inch or two of movement half way up. Should the forestay have less movement in it than the babystay?Thanks Click to expand... ghostlymoronRig tensioning or tuning is a bit of a black art. The Selden guide is a good starting point but only covers the basics and doesn't do ketch rigs at all if they have a triatic otherwise treat main and mizzen as completely separate. Some of the recommended tensions are scarily high for an old boat. I find the simple method described on "Cox engineering" website (now renamed) is easier to follow. I wouldn't want to sail a boat where the mast wasn't properly controlled in the centre. The baby stay failed one our one-time Sadler 29 after some years and I got the impression that it was doing quite a lot of work. Fortunately, it gave some warning by partly unravelling before failing completely.. Googling the images seems like some have fore and aft lower shrounds and some have just aft and a babystay. So, to the OP check which you have. If you only have aft lowers then the babystay is essential. However it is unlikely to be fitted if you have F&A shrouds. Tranona said: Googling the images seems like some have fore and aft lower shrounds and some have just aft and a babystay. So, to the OP check which you have. If you only have aft lowers then the babystay is essential. However it is unlikely to be fitted if you have F&A shrouds. Click to expand... As said a inner fore stay 4/5 way up the mast is most likely a stay to carry a small storm jib and as such is usually disconnected to give freedom of moving the jib across when tacking. An inner fore stay will usually be from the centre of the mast or centre of the distance between fore stay and base. Now a mast generally needs to be supported in the middle both sideways and fore and aft. Usually there will be intermediate side stays attached aft of the mast so they support the mast sideways but also pull the middle back. A baby or inner forestay from the same point will pull the middle forward. Or alternatively 2 stays pulling from forward of the mast will do the same job. An alternative often seen on fractional rig boats is to have the spreaders swing aft from abeam to meet cap shrouds which have chain plates aft of the aft. So the spreaders lean on or are pushed by the cap shroud to push the middle of the mast forward. Needs robust stiff spreaders. All this for a mast which needs support in the middle. If the mast has a large dimension in the fore and aft direction it may be stiff enough to not need middle forward support. As usually seen in racing dinghies. For the OP a baby fore stay attached 4/5 way up the mast will put a lot of load on that section of the mast not other wise supported. ie it will bend the mast from the attachment point forward. Mast may be considered stiff enough but generally it is desirable to support the mast at that point backwards and sideways. Often by running back stays. Hence for storm conditions you may set up a fore stay at 4/5 height and then set up running back stays to support it. The loads being large with a storm jib attached. Much more common is the middle inner fore stay which as said is set up in tension to make the mast straight or slightly middle forward bend. (in conjunction with the intermediate stays. Often the inner fore stay is made adjustable by tackle or handle on a turn screw so that more mast bend can be applied in stronger winds to flatten the main sail in conjunction with adjustable back stay. olewill Thanks Guys for the information.My concern was that the boatyard may not have attached the forestay close enough to the deck and that there would not be enough adjustment on the backstay.The baby stay should not be that tight because everybody seems to agree that it's main function is to fit a storm jib to?Yes it's a Colvic Sailor 26 and the babystay was probably a retro fit so I will try to check suitability of the backing plate.Will release tension on the babystay slowly and take up the backstay until full adjustment is used.If the forestay is still slack at that point I guess my concern about the forestay not being close enough to the deck may be correct?Hoping to avoid the mast having to be supported by a strop while the forestay is disconnected and re-positioned if this turns out to be necessary. crown22 said: Thanks Guys for the information.My concern was that the boatyard may not have attached the forestay close enough to the deck and that there would not be enough adjustment on the backstay.The baby stay should not be that tight because everybody seems to agree that it's main function is to fit a storm jib to?Yes it's a Colvic Sailor 26 and the babystay was probably a retro fit so I will try to check suitability of the backing plate.Will release tension on the babystay slowly and take up the backstay until full adjustment is used.If the forestay is still slack at that point I guess my concern about the forestay not being close enough to the deck may be correct? Hoping to avoid the mast having to be supported by a strop while the forestay is disconnected and re-positioned if this turns out to be necessary . Click to expand... You don't say where and how the inner stay (is is not a baby stay from the way you have described it). Normally an inner stay for a storm jib is mounted to the deck aft of the forestay, often some way back to pick up on a bulkhead and attached with a lever so that it can be removed when not in use. It is usually then brought back to the mast or a shroud. The orestay needs to be tight independent of an inner stay. If you do not have a storm jib you can remove this inner stay completely. Most Colvics I have seen in images have forward and aft lower shrouds so do not need a baby stay. Second picture showing shrouds has failed to upload.Will try to compress file size? crown22 said: Hello Guys two pictures attached.Am waiting for the boatyard people to come on board to shorten my floppy forestay. In the meantime I have tied the headsail halyard to the pulpit as extra backup.I am hoping that they will either find some extra adjustment inside the furling drum or will cut and shorten the attaching plate with holes in (does this have a name?) Don't want to do the job myself in case the mast comes down on top of me or my neighbour's boat! View attachment 72105 Click to expand... That inner forestay is removable by unclipping the lever. It is totally unnecessary on the boat. It was probably installed by an owner who had dreams of sailing oceans and wanted the ability to both use a storm job orfly twin sails downwind. Neither of those particularly valuable on the lake, nor indeed common set ups for coastal sailing. so, once you get the forestay sorted out suggest you release it and stow it at the mast then consider removing it completely. It will however support the mast completely and you could remove the forestay safely to sort out the bottom end fixings as Vic suggests. Spirit (of Glenans)VicS said: It is, I notice, a Plastimo furler They are supplied with a choice of two length of "side plares" ( IIRC 5 hole or 11 hole) The longer version is designed to fit around an existing bottle screw. The shorter version is designed to fit when there is no bottle screw on the forestay. The length of the side plates as such do do adjust the forestay tension they only only set the height of the drum above the stem head fitting. You appear to have a collection of shackles on the forestay. Not good! Toggles should be used when necessary to extend the stay and to provide articulation. However if the collection shackles cannot be replaced with a bottle screw, ( hopefully there are not that many up inside the drum), the simple solution will probably be to reduce the number of shackles ( and replace those that remain with toggles) and shorten the side plates by a few holes Plastimo gear is designed to be easily fitted DIY and there is no reason why you could not easily sort this out yourself with some basic hand tools ( Small adjustable spanner, pair of pliers and a hacksaw probably all you'd need) I have to say that Plastimo gear is fitted in a variety of, often ghastly, ways by people who dont seem to be able to read the instructions. I once went round the boat yard photographing some of the results. Not many were fitted exactly as per the instructions. Some were terrible. Yours may not be the worst I have seen but is is pretty poor ! If you do get the boat yard rigger to sort it out photograph the results and post the photo. Click to expand... Tranona said: That inner forestay is removable by unclipping the lever. It is totally unnecessary on the boat. It was probably installed by an owner who had dreams of sailing oceans and wanted the ability to both use a storm job orfly twin sails downwind. Neither of those particularly valuable on the lake, nor indeed common set ups for coastal sailing. so, once you get the forestay sorted out suggest you release it and stow it at the mast then consider removing it completely. It will however support the mast completely and you could remove the forestay safely to sort out the bottom end fixings as Vic suggests. Click to expand... Other threads that may be of interest- justanothersailboat
- 27 Aug 2024
Members onlineShare this page. |
COMMENTS
My recently acquired boat came with what was deswcribed as a 'quick-release' baby stay. A full-thickness wire stay attached with a snap shackle and rigging with a fold-out handle, to tension/detension the stay. Runs from a deck u-bolt about 5ft in front of the mast up to the spreaders.
Anarchist. What the baby stay does is pull the mid section of the mast forward. your checkstays stop it from going to far / pull the mid section of the mast aft. When the mid section goes forward the main flattens, leech opens up, and depowers. When the mid goes aft, the main deepens and hence powers up.
Oct 2, 2008. 3,809. Pearson/ 530 Strafford, NH. Jun 24, 2014. #4. I have baby stays with our cutter rig and was told it would reduce mast pumping when the staysail was used with no headsail going downwind. Our mast rarely pumps due to being heavily built. We keep our baby stay pulled forward out of the way. All U Get.
There are two lowers on each side, one forward of the mast position and one aft of the mast position. Some boats have a rig with a single lower and a babystay instead of forward lowers. This babystay replaces the forward lowers and is essential to the stability of the rig. On these rigs the existing lower is either aft of the mast or even with ...
A sailboat's standing rigging is generally built from wire rope, rod, or occasionally a super-strong synthetic fibered rope such as Dyneema ®, carbon fiber, kevlar or PBO. 1×19 316 grade stainless steel Wire Rope (1 group of 19 wires, very stiff with low stretch) is standard on most sailboats. Wire rope is sized/priced by its diameter which ...
41,815. Visit site. The baby stay is there for a reason as mrming says. Although you could make it removable for light airs it really is essential for security of the rig. It was a very popular rig at the time your boat was built as it means you don't need forward lowers to support the middle of the spar.
Making this baby stay removable is a good idea, as well as, we've found that Dynema rope is the best choice here. So… a centered mast head, side to side. A straight, in column mast from the top on down. A slight aft rake to start with…and as you begin to wind on the backstay and the baby stay you will add some rake but also a good bit ...
Baby stay:Attached in the region of the lower spreaders. The stay is not sail-carrying, but is intended to stay the lower panel of the mast fore-and-aft, in conjunction with ... On smaller yachts, the stay is led through a block at the mizzen mast top down to the deck, where the length can be adjusted. Cap shrouds: (V1-V3, D4) ...
baby stay The role of the baby stay is to pull the middle of the mast forward counteracting the pull aft of the intermediate side stays (chain plates aft of abeam the mast) so between them holding the middle of the mast in place. assuming one spreader rig. ... Down each side of the boat, how many cables and bottle screws do you have? My little ...
What rules of thumb are there regarding how to set the baby stay and inner forestay tension? I have a hydraulic backstay tensioner - should the hydraulic pretension be removed prior to tensioning the baby stay vs. inner forestay tension - Cruisers & Sailing Forums
My boat came with a removable baby stay and additional running backstays, the uppers of which were attached via T-ball fittings about 3/4 of the way up the mast. The baby stay has a hyfield lever for adjustment and has its own halyard tensioned by a mast-mounted winch that is shared with the main halyard. The running backstays are attached to ...
Jan 26, 2005. 1,259. C&C 110 Bay Shore, Long Island, NY. Jan 11, 2024. #4. shemandr said: Sailboatdata.com doesn't show that boat with a baby stay'. The line drawing on Sailboatdata.com clearly shows a baby stay for this boat. There are lower aft shrouds but no forward lower shrouds.
Most trailerable sailboats have a set of baby stays that attach to a hound about 6-7 feet off the deck and to the stantion bases at the beam. The same hound is used with a winch attached to raise and lower the mast, the baby stays keep the mast from swinging too far to port or starboard and twisting the mast base plate.
Messages. 13,857. Location. West Australia. Visit site. Any one contemplating running a sail on typical baby forestay (half mast height) should be able to tell if the deck where the baby stay attaches s strong enough. Baby stay should be designed to be loaded up to bend the middle of the mast forward. So sould be strong.
Baby Stay Question and other sailing discussion in the Seabreeze general forums, page 1. Forums > Sailing > > General. Subs Active Search New Topic. Subscribed Topics Active Topics Search New Topic. ... My boat has an inner forstay but it is permanently attached with a roller furler fitted. It is a cruising boat and would not be suitable for ...
I have a "Baby Stay" on my B381 that I would like to use to hang a storm jim if needed but not sure if it's designed for that. It also has a protective tube/sleeve for the first 5 feet or so that would have to be removed. I would hate to have to lower the genoa and raise a storm jib on the headstay in the storm.
also, tracks usually suck if you want to use the baby stay to control pre-bend and main sail shape. if you want to play with it properly, get a cacading 4:1 with a 64:1 cascade tweaker and leed the lines back to an ape in the pit. Attach the whole thing to your well-reneforced bulkhead with a snap shackle.
I have just upgraded my boat and the new girl has a Baby-Stay. I can see that it it set up such that it's tension can be adjusted easily, or it can be diconnected. What I am struggeling with it what it is there for in the first place. I have scoured a number of books and little refernece is made to a Baby-Stay, the few time it is mentioned it ...
Many racing masts would not survive without a baby stay. A serious 30 to 70ft cruising boat should never be designed to have a baby stay as it is a unnecessary inconvenience on a cruising boat. And that is the crux of the matter. The Bene's, as with most mass produced boats, are not designed for serious ocean cruising. This is not a Bene bash.
An all-electric hydrofoiling boat from Swedish company Candela has set two new world records by travelling between Stockholm and the Finnish autonomous region of Åland, marking the first time an electric boat has crossed the Baltic Sea. Candela, which has developed a range of electric hydrofoil ...
How has Italy reduced small boat arrivals by more than 60% in a year and what is the Albania scheme? Sir Keir Starmer says he is looking to Italy for answers in how to reduce Channel crossings
Well-known member. Joined. 10 Nov 2007. Messages. 41,849. Visit site. The two stays do different things. suggest you slacken off the babystay, tension the forestay by by adjusting the backstay. The babystay and the aft lower shrouds should then be tensioned so that the mast is straight with no bend in the middle.