- - - |
I prefer the colors options from the YM but the fact that there's no ceramic bezel is a turn off. So I would go with the sub c ND Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
since you said yacht master... i would go sub... but if yacht II well i would go yacht II. but hold on; is this real life or dreaming? real life would have to go sub too... cant afford the yacht II. (welll cant afford the sub either but..... )
lol. for me, it's real life, but it is quite a ways away.
YM, much more interesting aesthetically . . .
Yacht Master Vs. Submariner Date you mean? 114060 Submariner for me if I had to choose The Yacht Master is too much watch for me, it's so blingy that it shouts at you If there is a watch that could make the Submariner seem low key, its the Yacht Master I would feel like I would really baby the YM and wear it on special occasions as opposed to the Sub which could be worn daily
I kind of love that color combo on the watch master. If I had to pick one, I’d go YM and then start saving for a GMT!
I sold my subC and bought a YM. Much better case profile, slimmer, without protruding square lugs like the sub = better fit for me. I wish the subC had the same case profile as the YM and I would have kept the subC hands down.
Depends on your collection I think. If you need a sports watch the Sub c. If you need a blingy AP or VC type upscale sports watch then the yachtmaster. Is the sub c flashy enough for your taste? If not get the yachtmaster. It is like 3k more though isn’t it? Also the yachtmaster is probably easier to get right now. I know two buddies that purchased it because there wasn’t any other sports models available. It’s a gorgeous watch though. I especially like the rhodium dial and blue seconds hand.
I would pick the sub. Yes, the fat lugs are fugly and there’s no way around it other than to take a grinding too to the side of the case. However, at least it is what it is and has a strong history. The YM seems to float in a weird limbo of “not really dressy not really sporty.” It’s basically a sub with a fancier bezel (which I think is bi-directional), and a bunch of polishing. Why? Why does it exist? Not really sure.
Toothbras said: I would pick the sub. Yes, the fat lugs are fugly and there's no way around it other than to take a grinding too to the side of the case. However, at least it is what it is and has a strong history. The YM seems to float in a weird limbo of "not really dressy not really sporty." It's basically a sub with a fancier bezel (which I think is bi-directional), and a bunch of polishing. Why? Why does it exist? Not really sure. Click to expand...
One more thing, I have to admit I do like the Omega 2254 type large font on the YM bezel, it’s nice looking
I’d go with the Sub, but the blue dialed YM is a stunner.
FirstF80InSpace said: I have both. I prefer the YM because it's way more comfortable and I love the blue dial. SubC is my beater watch because of the brushed links and ceramic bezel. Click to expand...
I agree with you as I absolute love the blue YM. But it is a tough buy as a first Rolex because it is hard for me to pull it off in an everyday setting. It just has too much bling to not become the center of every conversation I have. So I went with the Sub. Hope to get both one day.
I'll take the Sub all day long. The YM has never done anything for me. My opinion...it's a watch that is trying too hard to find its way.
That's a tough one. I would usually go with the Sub but ever since I saw that exact YM in the wild, it's a toss up for me. That YM is beautiful in person, and so different than the Sub which you find everywhere. Can't go wrong with either!
I'd go for the SubC ND before I went with the stainless rhodium dialed YM. However, if I could afford the YM 40mm in rose gold with the black rubber strap I'd be dropping the $24K MSRP in a heartbeat. Bringing the sunburst blue dialed YM into the mix does make it more difficult, but I think the SubC ND would get more wrist time for it's ability to be dressed up or down more easily and it's ease of 'set-n-go' with the lack of the date function. (I know you referenced a SubC, but I'd strongly urge you to consider a SubC ND.) If I already owned a SubC (Date or No Date) I'd be eyeing that blue dialed YM very seriously - because I know I can't afford a $24K Rose Gold YM when I could get 2 stainless sports models for that price...
exiLe said: I know you referenced a SubC, but I'd strongly urge you to consider a SubC ND.) If I already owned a SubC (Date or No Date) I'd be eyeing that blue dialed YM very seriously. Click to expand...
I love the blue dial YM. It is really different and isn't the most copied watch in history. If it's too dressy pair it with an OP for daily beating and your set. The sub is a great watch but next to the YM is just boring.
Def would have said SubC until I saw that blue YM. What a stunner!
Tough one to advise on as it's hard to read your mind :-! Personally, I would go with the Sub. Subs a classic, the yachtmaster is the flash new boy ...you can try both , then decide. Cheers.
Of the 2 in the original post I would go for the YM as I loathe the fat lugs on the Sub D/ND If we went back a generation to the 5 digit references it would be a harder choice for me
My Preference is the Sub due to my lifestyle, it just covers all the bases so well. It's my work watch, weekend watch, formal watch, tropical scuba holiday watch. That rose gold yachtmaster is beautiful though... Either way you are getting an awesome watch.
I have a SubC. I admire the YM blue dial, but prefer the SubC if I were limited to only 1. The gold YM with the OF strap is a non starter for me. I can't accept a PM watch on a rubber strap. I had the chance to buy that YM or even a Daytona PM on the rubber strap but could not do it. I consolidated some pieces and did buy a YG Sub black dial.
Sub by a mile.
The Submariner is a nice watch, it goes well with casual or formal wear. You will get the value for your hard earned money. The Yachtmaster is a nice watch, it has more polished areas and looks great with business attire. IMO I will pick the sub over the YM
The blue YM does wonders for me. So does the everose on the oysterflex. Not a fan of the black subs. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
<a href=\"https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikivoyage/w/poi2gpx.php?print=gpx&lang=en&name=Oryol\" title=\"Download GPX file for this article\" data-parsoid=\"{}\"><img alt=\"Download GPX file for this article\" resource=\"./File:GPX_Document_rev3-20x20.png\" src=\"//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f7/GPX_Document_rev3-20x20.png\" decoding=\"async\" data-file-width=\"20\" data-file-height=\"20\" data-file-type=\"bitmap\" height=\"20\" width=\"20\" class=\"mw-file-element\" data-parsoid='{\"a\":{\"resource\":\"./File:GPX_Document_rev3-20x20.png\",\"height\":\"20\",\"width\":\"20\"},\"sa\":{\"resource\":\"File:GPX Document rev3-20x20.png\"}}'/></a></span>"}'/>
Oryol ( Russian : Eagle ) is a city in the Chernozemye region of the Russian Federation . This regional capital is a destination for its clean air, old churches, and extensive literary and dramatic history.
Oryol is located 368 km to the South from Moscow , on the way to Ukraine and Crimea . It is just a 5-hour drive from Moscow, the road is a 4-lane highway until Tula , often bumpy though, and then 2-3 lanes of a moderate quality. Alternatively, you can take an express commuter train from Kursky railway station in Moscow. It starts at 6PM and arrives at Oryol at 10:40PM There is also an overnight 'sleeping' train starting at 11PM and arriving before 6AM Generally, there are a LOT of trains passing Oryol from Moscow on their way to Ukraine. The fare is US$10-20-40 depending on the carriage class.
Firmenny sleeper train Turgenev № 603/604 rides between Oryol and Moscow daily.
The central part of the city is pleasant and walkable. To travel around, locals choose between public buses, trolley-buses, trams and numerous minibus-taxies. Fares vary from a fixed US$0.33 (buses, trolley-buses and trams) to US$0.50 (minibus-taxies); however, you may prefer to move around by a private taxi (US$3-7 for trips within the city). The interesting means of transportation is a river tram , a boat shuttling on the river for tourist purposes but may be used for other ones. It goes from the Central Park to Luzhki aka Luzhkovsky Bridge at 10-00, 12-00, 14-00, 16-00, 18-00, 20-00 if there is no less than 10 passengers abroad.
Rusmania • Deep into Russia
16th century.
Times of troubles.
Administrative reform.
Literary connections.
Soviet power.
Ready-to-book tours.
Your holiday in Russia starts here. Choose and book your tour to Russia.
Looking for something unique? Create the trip of your dreams with the help of our experts.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Rolex owners are talking. They both have same movement, the older ym has a different dial color more monochromatic. Bezel is platinum only has a 5 digit model . The sub is the 5 digit model as well, all stainless with black face.bezel also easy to change out if damaged with a low cost. They are both 40mm.
Reddit's go-to source for news and discussion about Rolex and Tudor watches. ... Submariner vs Yacht Master . I'm contemplating my first Rolex purchase and have narrowed it down to either a Submariner or a Yacht Master. I am looking for an everyday watch that I can also wear while sailing. ... A. The Submariner is the greatest luxury sports ...
Assuming you are talking about modern date versions of both, the Sub is bigger by 1mm (41 vs 40). But the biggest difference in my opinion is the fact that the lugs on the YM are curved down more, making it sit better on smaller wrists. Other than that, a matter of options on the bezel, dials, etc. I have both.
Hey Guys, I am a first time rolex purchaser and had a quick question before pulling the trigger. I want to purchase a nice tool watch and have narrowed it down to three choices (Happy to hear suggestion however) My first choice is the Yacht-Master ref 116622. Second choice being the classic black submariner and third choice being the black GMT ...
I own both. I like the yachtmaster better as an all around watch, but the bezel an issue. I had looked for a few different used models for my wife, and even in perfect condition, they don't look as good as the sub bezel. The metal bezel just does not compare well to the ceramic.
Hands are slightly wider. All the differences are cosmetic, as the movements the same. A Yacht Master is a datejust with mercedes hands and a dive bezel and 100m of water resistant. A Sub is more of a tool watch with a boxy profile less flashy with its brushed bracelet and 300m of water resistant you'll never use.
Hi Rolex community, I always wanted a sub for absolutely no reasons. Maybe because it was (is?) the most known model in the line up... Then I started looking at other products within the range and fell in love with a white dial Yachtmaster with platinum bezel.
We would like to show you a description here but the site won't allow us.
Award. HafizJMehmood. •. Hi all, In this video, I have shown the Yachtmaster in 4K quality with macro shots and have discussed why this maybe a better choice for you, even if you are in the market for Rolex Submariner. The video includes wrist shot on my 6.5" wrist so if you're in the market for one and share the same wrist size, you'd ...
The Yacht-Master is a luxury sports watch that launched in 1992 in an 18k yellow gold case. Since then, ladies' models have accompanied these rugged timekeeping tools as well as several innovative features like the mid-size man's model and the Rolesium case, crafted from a mix of Rolex's 904-L grade stainless steel and 905 platinum.
Due to the wide range of materials and styles, we are going to compare two examples from each series that are as closely matched as possible; the ref. 116610LN Submariner Date and the ref. 126622 Yacht-Master 40. Prices: the base model Yacht-Master Reference 126622 has a current retail price of $11,800 USD and the base model Submariner 116610 ...
Yacht-Master Dials. The Yacht-Master's dials have been available in various of colors and materials over the years, including the stunning blue dial on the ref. 116622 and the opulent platinum dial on the now-discontinued version. The Yacht-Master was the first model to use Rolex's Maxi dial and was the final component that appeared with ...
Size: The Submariner is a sleek 40mm size, ideal for readability without being too much of a statement. The Rolex Yacht-Master, however, is more tailored. The Yacht-Master comes in 37mm, 40mm and 42mm cases. The 37mm was designed as a women's watch.
The Yacht-Master, with cases available in 37mm, 40mm, and 42mm, offers a water resistance of 100m, suitable for occasional aquatic activities. Conversely, the Submariner, available in 37mm, 40mm, and 41mm sizes, boasts a 300m water resistance, ideal for divers and water sports aficionados. Ultimately, the decision between the Rolex Yacht-Master ...
The Yacht-Master is water-resistant up to 100 meters (330 feet), making it suitable for sailing and other water-related activities. However, the Submariner is water-resistant up to 300 meters (1,000 feet), making it the ideal choice for professional divers and those who require a watch that can withstand extreme underwater conditions.
New Yachtmaster vs Submariner. I don't own either & this is purely my opinion based on owning various Rolex models over the last 25 years. I currently own 3 Panerai & a Tudor Jumbo Date-Day. The new Yachtmaster in titanium looks to me like the Submariner should, based on its history as a diving tool watch. The Submariner is now blingy ...
Since then, I prefer to wear an all gold or all WG or steel watch. i prefer the submariner or GST to the yacht master (I agree with @nicole0612). But, JMO. Buy what you love . Reactions: gainzilla, A1aGypsy and nicole0612 ... Rolex Yacht-Master vs. Submariner Date Review - Bob's Watches
Yacht master 42 vs submariner Rolex General Discussion ROLEX ROLEX ROLEX ROLEX ROLEX ROLEX ROLEX ROLEX ... Yacht master 42 vs submariner. Ready? Fight! Attached Images. 397F0026-2079-4E3A-87CF-467768CE5A1A.png (192.1 KB, 897 views) E3172BEC-A265-477E-98AE-5B3A281C4B63.png (256.2 KB, 888 views)
The Submariner is a nice watch, it goes well with casual or formal wear. You will get the value for your hard earned money. The Yachtmaster is a nice watch, it has more polished areas and looks great with business attire. IMO I will pick the sub over the YM. You must keep to time. Miko2022.
Map of Oryol Oblast. 52.968611 36.069444 1 Oryol — the regional capital and only city of any significant size is a destination for its clean air, old churches, and extensive literary and dramatic history. 52.425306 37.608306 2 Livny — a small city built on the site of a former Russian fort, which often found itself at the center of conflict ...
Oryol is located 368 km to the South from Moscow, on the way to Ukraine and Crimea. It is just a 5-hour drive from Moscow, the road is a 4-lane highway until Tula, often bumpy though, and then 2-3 lanes of a moderate quality. Alternatively, you can take an express commuter train from Kursky railway station in Moscow.
17th Century Times of Troubles. Oryol played a significant role during the Times of Troubles and suffered as a result of this. In May 1605 Oryol was captured by the forces of the First False Dmitri.Later in August 1606 the city's population and the garrison at the fortress gave their support to the rebellion lead by Ivan Bolotnikov.In the winter of 1607 and 1608 the Second False Dmitri set up ...
Landscape of the eastern part of the region In the national park Orlovskoye Polesye. It is located in the southwestern part of the Central Federal District, in the Central Russian Upland.. In terms of area, at 24,652 km 2 (9,518 sq mi) it is one of the smallest federal subjects. [11] From north to south, it extends for more than 150 km (93 mi), and from west to east—for over 200 km (120 mi).